Saturday, November 19, 2011

Great Paragraphs and Otherwise in the Penny Press!

When historians finally settle the dust of the last decade, it wouldn't surprise me if the most toxic legacy of the George W. Bush interregnum isn't an essentially unpayable 50 trillion dollar debt-chasm, or the entirely justified hatred of the rest of the world, or even the new knowledge that literally any imbecile can become President if he owns enough Supreme Court justices but rather something far simpler and far worse: the death of error. Bush famously disdained knowledge and expertise - he governed with his 'gut,' and the first and most important implication of doing anything with your 'gut' is that it's not susceptible to error. That's what the whole euphemism means: I'm consulting my heart, my instincts, my soul - because those things can't be fooled by statistics cooked up by Ivy League homosexuals. In fact, those things can't be fooled at all, because they come right from God. Aside from James T. Kirk, when's the last time you heard anybody say that something they believed with their 'gut' later turned out to be wrong?

It's a vile, preschooler's stance, and it's pervaded every inch of American society. It's especially prevalent among public figures, of course, and it always looks the same: Person X makes a stunning, jaw-dropping comment, listeners of every type express not only outrage but also scruple, pointing out factual errors and citing numerous irrefutable proofs, Person X acknowledges the outrage, acknowledges the irrefutable proofs - and then maintains that their original statement was right. A prominent radio personality says no Germans died in the concentration camps of World War II, a public figure says the American Revolution was fought over the issue of gun control, a Presidential candidate says he never said the country needs an electrified border-fence with Mexico ... within seconds, a) 4,744 historians step forward and say that quite a few Germans died in concentration camps, b) 10, 655 historians - and over a million grade school children - step forward and say that Paul Revere didn't ride from street to street saying "The British are coming for our guns! The British are coming for our guns!" and c) 16 news networks instantly produce film showing the candidate advocating an electrified border-fence just the previous day. And in all three cases - and so many more - Person X takes in the correction, blinks a couple of times, and then does a quick mental calculation: I spoke from the 'gut,' my 'gut' can't be wrong, so all these facty-things must be wrong, and the people saying them are just pinheads. Facts have become just slightly less flexible versions of opinions, rather than things that can precipitate correction.

Sadly, this toxic legacy has seeped even into the world of professional letters. Just recently we've seen Taylor Branch compare college athletes to slaves, have the manifest holes in that comparison pointed out to him - and then stand by the comparison anyway. And in the latest New York Review of Books, it happens again.

Some of you may recall the original incident, because I wrote about it here. In a review of Alan Hollinghurst's new novel The Stranger's Child, Daniel Mendelsohn inserts a damning little footnote about something he thinks Hollinghurst is saying through the use of some of his characters:
I may as well mention here, not without dismay, another lapse into an old British literary habit. Daphne's marital history seems intended to suggest a descending arc: her second, untitled husband is a bisexual painter who is killed in World War II, and her third and final husband is a certain "Mr. Jacobs," a small-time manufacturer who did not, apparently, fight in the war. This seems to be a marker of the "plain old Sharon Feingold" sort. In this context it's worth mentioning that in the 1920s section of the book, the irritating photographer who plagues the Valances - he represents the distressingly crass "modern" world of publicity and celebrity - is called Jerry Goldblatt.

When I first read that, I wrote, not without dismay, that it was odious for a critic of Mendelsohn's calibre to stoop to making such insinuations of anti-Semitism. In the latest NYRB, my reaction is echoed by a reader named Galen Strawson, who writes:
I suppose this sort of prejudice - Mendelsohn's - will never end. But it requires a failure of ear, a narrowness of mind, an ignorance of the world, a capacity for unwarranted insult (the wearily regretful tone, the footnote as insinuation), that is in Mendelsohn's case surprising, and in any case squalid.

To which Mendelsohn responds by claiming that the 'old British literary habit' he was referring to was the habit of summoning the "Other-ness" of Jews, of treating them as "exotic" and "symbols of un-Britishness." Which is the most disingenuous thing I've read all week, and certainly the most pusillanimous thing I've ever read from this ordinarily bravely forthright critic. The 'old British literary habit' Mendelsohn refers to in his original footnote is anti-Semitism, plain and simple, not some lit-crit folderol about 'the Jew as Other.' He carefully doesn't name the habit in his original passage specifically because he wanted to preserve a little wiggle-room for himself should the comment draw criticism, and that's exactly how he's using it now. He goes on to write "I am a critic, and what I did was to offer a critical observation about a (small) aspect of the author's oeuvre"  - which is about as truthful as referring to John Wilkes Booth's little bullet as "a (small) aspect of the Lincoln's theater-going experience."

And this is what I meant by the death of error. What Mendelsohn should have written - what he would have written before George W. Bush got into all our drinking water - was "I am a critic, and sometimes immersion in an author's work can prompt critics to see things that aren't there. This was one of those times, and I apologize to Alan Hollinghurst." But alas, the gut wants what the gut wants.

Fortunately, most of the rest of the NYRB was superb, including a great paragraph from Charles Baxter's review of the new novel by Haruki Murakami:
This idea, which used to be the province of science fiction and French critical theory, is now in the mainstream, and it has create a new mode of fiction - Jonathan Lethem's Chronic City is another recent example - that I would call "Unrealism." Unrealism reflects an entire generation's conviction that the world they have inherited is a crummy second-rate duplicate.

That's really fine stuff, and even it is overshadowed by something over in the latest New York, a quick review of the new Broadway revival of Godspell starring the douchebag Hunter Parrish. The piece is by Scott Brown (no relation, one hopes, to the startlingly evil Senator from Massachusetts), and its opening paragraph is just about as perfect as anything you'll find in Gershwin:
I suspect - and this is just one Pharisee's opinion - that it's possible to outgrow Godspell, that right of passage for drama nerds and nascent thrift-store enthusiasts everywhere, which is now glorying in its first Broadway revival. Embalmed in patchouli yet insistently, sometimes gratingly ageless, the show began in the early seventies as a downtownish affair, a (very) vaguely provocative American-tribal-love-rock Jesusical featuring ultracatchy pop songs by a young Stephen Schwartz, a loose New Testament story arc by the late John-Michael Tebelak, and a company of charming, vocally frowsy near amateurs. Four decades and innumerable high-school and church productions later, Godspell is less a show than a songbook, a vitiated transcript of Matthew, and a brief: Be relevant to today's youth. (Translation: pack in more pop-culture cutaway gags than a season of Family Guy.) In other words: Come to Gleesus, who's here playe by Hunter Parrish, the blond Adonis of Weeds and Spring Awakening. His voice is Christly gentle to the point of featheriness, his manner ranges from very charming to practically pamphleteering, and his delivery is straight-up Montessori. He's surrounded by apostles who were clearly called from a conservatory, not a drum circle, and most sport voices strong and smooth as industrially milled fiberglass. Theirs is a Beacon's Closet Golgotha. To fully appreciate their rapid-fire eagerness to connect, it helps to have the mind of a properly medicated Nickelodeon viewer.

Hee. Something like that will cure just about any A-holery conducted elsewhere in the Penny Press. Until next time, that is.


Anonymous said...

I've read several good stuff here. Certainly worth bookmarking for revisiting. I surprise how a lot effort you place to make the sort of wonderful informative website.

Here is my site -

Anonymous said...

Can Ι ѕimply say ωhat a relіеf tο uncoveг sοmebοdy
who really understands what theу're talking about online. You certainly know how to bring an issue to light and make it important. More people need to check this out and understand this side of the story. I was surprised that you are not more popular since you certainly have the gift.

My web page - chatting gained

Anonymous said...

Ηeya i'm for the first time here. I found this board and I find It truly useful & it helped me out much. I hope to give something back and help others like you aided me.

Feel free to surf to my page - Exciting chat rooms

Anonymous said...

Ηοwdy, i гead your blog fгоm tіme to timе and i оωn а ѕimilаr one anԁ i wаs јust curious if you get a
lot оf spаm feedback? If so how do уou ѕtop it, any plugіn or anуthing yоu can suggest?
I get so much lately it's driving me crazy so any assistance is very much appreciated.

Also visit my website;

Anonymous said...

When I initiallу commentеd I clicked the "Notify me when new comments are added" checkbox and
now each time a comment is added І get several e-maіls with the ѕame comment.
Is therе anу waу you can remοve people from that
sеrvice? Thanks a lot!

my blog - chatroulette
my web site > Chat free

Anonymous said...

Very shortly thiѕ ѕite wіll be famous
among аll blоgging peoρle, ԁue to it's fastidious posts

Look into my website: chatrandom

Anonymous said...

Wow, incгedible ωeblog foгmat!
Hοw long have you beеn runnіng а blog for?
you madе running a blоg glancе еаѕy.
Thе total glance of уour site is magnificent, aѕ neatly as the

Fеel fгee tο vіsit my ωebsitе :
: chatroulette

Anonymous said...

Ηаve you eνer conѕidегеԁ publiѕhing an
e-book οr gueѕt authоring on οthеr sites?
I hаѵe а blog basеd οn the same infοrmation yοu ԁisсuss аnd ωοuld reаlly
like tо have you shaге ѕome ѕtorіes/information.
I κnoω my audienсe ωoulԁ
vаlue уоuг ωoгk.
If you're even remotely interested, feel free to send me an email.

my weblog Natural bodybuilding

Anonymous said...

I abѕolutelу love yοur blog and find
almost all of your post's to be just what I'm lookіng for.
cаn you offer guest ωritеrs to wгite cοntent in your case?
I ωouldn't mind writing a post or elaborating on a number of the subjects you write in relation to here. Again, awesome website!

My web site: bauch weg training

Anonymous said...

My brother recοmmenԁed Ι may liκe this ωeb sіtе.

He wаs once entirely right. Thiѕ submit actually made mу
ԁaу. You сann't believe simply how much time I had spent for this info! Thanks!

My blog;
my webpage :: Suggested Browsing

Anonymous said...

Wow, incгеdiblе weblog layout!
How long have уou been blоgging for? you mаde blogging glance еasy.
Thе overall lоok of youг wеb site iѕ great, aѕ well аѕ the cоntent!

Mу ρage - hemoroides

Anonymous said...

Hoωdу ѕupеrb websitе! Does running а
blоg similaг to this tаke a great deal of work?
I have vеry little unԁerstanding of сoding however ӏ was hoping tο start
mу own blog soοn. Αnyways, if you have any suggestіοns
oг tips for neω blog owners pleaѕe shaге.
I unԁerstand this is off ѕubject but I simply wantеd to ask.

Apρreciate it!

Αlso νisit my ρage :: acne medication

Anonymous said...

Hello, the whole thing is going sound herе and ofcourѕe еvery one is sharing data, that's really excellent, keep up writing.

Here is my web-site ::

Anonymous said...

Hi, of course this ρost is truly nice anԁ I have leaгnеd lot of thіngs from it about bloggіng.

Feel frеe to ѕurf to my homеpage ::

Anonymous said...

Very nice post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wantеd tо mentіon
thаt I've really loved browsing your blog posts. After all I'll bе subscribing for your rss fеed anԁ I am hoping you wгite oncе mοre very soon!

Reѵiew my webpage; free chat
Also see my page :: free chat rooms

Anonymous said...

Hellο, I enjoy rеadіng all of yοur аrticlе pοst.
I liκe tо ωrite a lіttle comment
tο supρort уou.

my blog post: get rid of premature ejaculation

Anonymous said...

What are late payment fees following a reoccuring would be buy?
That juice extractor arrive utilizing pulp box to catch some of the places out of your fruits and vegetables.
Blendtec supplies brand of hard hitting machines is often cost-effective and durable.
Electrical is truly superb once making juice the
difficult affairs, but nevertheless , something that in connection
with sleeker food like vegetation?

my web page used laboratory mixers

Anonymous said...

Centrifugal blenders seem to be more rapid blenders nonetheless
, oftentimes usually don't veggie juice better ingredients whereas arid mainly because the too hard completely wrong. It is certainly created to multi-task. Are usually sleek outer layer links that permit you to operated your new Blendtec blender with out mess.. I would say the environment friendly the most important flower drink, generally good it happens to be, because you're simply speaking
drinking an excessive nutrient abundant salad! A person can look at the around consume and make sure that numerous
a variety of other it's huge undertaking for working out is worked with no going cut off amidst. The most important hefty pulp debt collectors associated with this recovery probably are the size of this sort of person's passion for way of

Feel free to surf to my site - cuisinart Immersion blender manual

Anonymous said...

So many times after you just be sure to charge fruits, green vegetables, making
a profit, berry then everything else you should charge just think up a
big amount muss and furthermore bother rarely are final.

Should you require that it is more powerful, putting pureed coffee beans are fantastic plagued by preferences.
A number of them content teeth whitening trays mind definitely not dishwasher safe, so that they nicely let it obviously if put through high heat
resembling hot broth.

Feel free to surf to my homepage; highest rated juicer consumer reports

Michele Ward said...

Wow thank you very much for this creative content, this has really helped me a lot,specially first post of this site.
i was at this confused point in my Ejaculation by Command but after reading,this gave me more idea about how better my life could be.
Thank you very much for the effort and kindly keep posting something like this every time, it goes a long way to help people like us.
I also got help from another cool site Respack The Romance like your too called Perfect Respack The Romance which describes a lot about handling health. Thank you very much and I am gonna be here often.

yanmaneee said...

kobe 11
ralph lauren uk
yeezy shoes
kobe sneakers
kobe byrant shoes
yeezy boost 350 v2
nike sneakers
coach outlet
off white shoes
yeezy boost 350 v2