Showing posts with label tv. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tv. Show all posts

Thursday, March 06, 2008

Stevesees: New Amsterdam




We return to Stevesees just briefly, to take approving notice of the new Fox series "New Amsterdam," an offbeat New York crime drama featuring the main character John Amsterdam, who's three hundred years old, gifted (or cursed) with physical immortality by long-vanished Native Americans, who stipulated that time would find him when he found the one true love of his life.

We meet him centuries later, when he's a homicide detective in Manhattan (death, he says, intrigues him - "it's always playing hard to get"). In the first episode, he's somewhat predictably saddled with a sharp-tongued sassy new female partner and a fairly pro-forma crime to solve procedurally. And there's some interest in that, mainly as the viewers get more and more hints about the full dimensions of Amsterdam's long life - presumably he's been a detective for some many years, and thanks to the just slightly off-kilter physical movements and the can't-quite-place-it accent of lead Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, it all comes off as believably just a stitch away from placeably mundane.

He's seen so many partners come and go that he can't take her seriously. She's smart, sharp, and sensitive, but she faces an unbeatable edge of accumulated experience in her new partner, who's a little slow to acknowledge that she can even tell him anything, much less teach him anything.

Instead, he laconically taunts her with lines that are complete nonsequiturs to anybody who doesn't know his unbelievable past, like telling her he knows a bar was once a speak-easy in the 30s because he used to drink there, or that she reminds him of his last 609 girlfriends.

He's slightly sloppier elsewhere in his life, when he's confronting a young murder suspect on a subway platform and allows himself to be shot (he first calmly tells his young attacker what it felt like to be shot by the old style unjacketed bullet - that it felt like 'fire dropped in your veins' - as anybody unfortunate to be shot before 1921 could attest, if any such were still alive). As he's collapsing on the subway platform, he has the indistinct but immovable sensation that after all these centuries, he's come an armsbreadth away at last from the woman who can create inside him his much-dreamt-of mortality (as problem-prone modern day TV would have it, the subway platform security cameras - which he later scrutinizes - show an unhelpful plethora of beautiful young women flocking to his aid), and so the series gets its giddy-yap: at the thought that now, after all this time, his wait may be over.

His old (literally and figuratively - indeed, the two can't help but be the same, in this series) friend Omar, played pitch-perfectly by always-welcome character actor Stephen Henderson, can sarcastically comment all he likes "You meet your true love and the die? Doesn't sound too romantic to me," but Omar is less tolerant of the friend he's known so long that he can't help but be privy to Amsterdam's central secret. And when he hears about this subway encounter, he warns, "When you don't find her, you're gonna go crazy. And the last time you went crazy ... it was a long damn ten years."

Actually, in the first episode, the dynamic between these two is the best thing in the show (the dynamic between Amsterdam and his new partner gets much, much better in the next few episodes), comfortably handling the scam they've got going on the side: Amsterdam builds ornate desks that Omar then sells as 'antiques' done a century ago by a revered master - who was, naturally, Amsterdam.

His sloppiness on that subway platform - allowing himself to get shot, subsequently getting carted to the morgue and needing to sneak out unseen - sets in motion the show's other ongoing plotline, the suspicions of the doctor on call when he's brought in (she even notices that his blood type is " Rz/Rz," which was common among certain Native American tribes but is now extinct), a doctor who may be the very life-love he's seeking.

But sweetest aspect of the show is the nice ear the writers have for time. Time winds its way through this series like another character, and it's handled better and more sensitively than most TV shows usually do (the show's obvious ancestor, "Highlander," was so caught up in the hurly-burly of sword-fights and decapitations that it hardly ever paused to mine this very obvious aspect of its main character - the show did so only once to our recollection, with Duncan MacCleod comforting an old woman in her hospital bed who had once been his beautiful young lover)("New Amsterdam" nods in "Highlander"s direction, when in a future episode a kid asks Amsterdam if he's ever had his head cut off and he gamely says he hasn't).

Living forever and finding your one true love: mankind's two longest-running dreams, fused into one TV show. The Native American woman who gifts Amsterdam with immortality solemnly intones, "In all of time, there is only one person we are meant to be with," and the series buys into this idea completely, preferring not to face a much starker possibility: that an immortal would find the love of his life not once but a few times, and lose that love every time. The pilot comes close, when Amsterdam tells a grieving mother that he knows the pain she's going through: "He was six, my son - almost six. It's pain without end."

Obviously, a weekly TV show with any hopes for success can't take 'pain without end' as its tagline, but still: at times, there's a very appealing sadness to Coster-Waldau's portrayal of Amsterdam.

But it's a dogged optimism that wins the day and brings the first episode to its stunning 20-second last shot: we see Amsterdam hundreds of years ago, as he wakes up on the first morning of his new life. He's disheveled and bearded, and around him under a clear sky is a pristine wilderness. And as the camera pans, his appearance neatens - and the wilderness changes: villages appear grow and disappear, muddy streets appear and widen and become paved, buildings appear and grown and wildly multiply, cars appear, and people, and more people, in one sweeping arc that brings us back to the present, to Amsterdam walking his dog in the place where he was born all those centuries ago: Times Square. It's a bravura visual feature that's over ironically fast, and a great deal of historical care went into its construction - we noticed building facades and adornments that really did once exist, their recreations here flickering into and then back out of existence in an instant. If "New Amsterdam" can give its viewers even one such thrilling moment every episode, the show will amply justify its existence.

Sunday, September 10, 2006

Fall Previews!


Surely there can be few simple pleasures to equal the Fall Preview issue of TV Guide!

Ah! The age-old joy opening the issue, surveying all the upcoming fall shows, weighing and balancing each's possible merits against its chances of cancellation.

And the joy is heightened these days by the unprecedented free-wheeling mindless bloodsport that network tv has devolved into. except in weirdly isolated cases or backwater channels, shows have precisely ONE episode to score enormous, unparalleled ratings, or else they're ignominiously shuttled around the schedule and then cancelled. Instead of winning an audience with good writing and acting, new shows try to TRICK their way into an audience by upping the adrenaline levels ('24') or relying exclusively on plot twists ('Lost,' 'Prison Break').

Specialty channels can get around this, of course ('Deadwood' and 'Battlestar Galactica' spring to mind), but network TV has come more and more to resemble the way big-screen movies now operate: the opening splash is everything.

This creates a dichotomy here at stevereads. As some of you may know, I like to watch every new show at least once, rather than follow the buzz of just a few (to put it mildly, sometimes I find myself liking a show the critics, overworked and paid to be cynical, all panned). This was always possible in the past, but now, with the sword of Damocles hanging over every new show, I've got to watch them all QUICK, or they might vanish altogether.

I'll manage, don't you fear! In addition to multiple VCRs, I'll use my customary two strategies: a) I'll defer watching old favorites if they conflict with new shows, and b) of course I'll completely ignore 'reality' shows and 'game' shows - programs that not only want but NEED their audiences to be stupid.

So! Let's see where that leaves us!

MONDAY at 8

'The Class' and 'How I Met Your Mother' opposite '7th Heaven' opposite 'Prison Break' ... only 'The Class' is new, and network sitcoms don't tend to be actually funny. Still, I'll give it a try, skip the rather anemic 'How I Met Your Mother' and then settle comfortably into ignoring ALL of these shows and reading on Mondays from 8 to 9

MONDAY at 9

'Two and a Half Men' and 'The New Adventures of Old Christine' opposite 'Runaway' opposite 'Vanished' opposite 'Heroes' ... the sitcoms can be ignored, and I've already seen enough of 'Vanished' to know that I like it plenty - that leaves 'Runaway,' which already bores me, and 'Heroes,' which I'm kinda thinking is going to be my favorite new show of the season. So I'll watch 'Heroes' and tape 'Runaway' and hope to get around to 'Vanished.'

MONDAY at 10

'What about Brian' opposite 'CSI Miami' opposite 'Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip' ... I can skip 'CSI Miami' for a few weeks (even though I like it well enough, despite the instantly lampoonable rantings of David Caruso), and that leaves me with a choice of evils: a show about how ODD it is that a 25-year-old guy isn't married and procreating, and a block of cheap cynicism about what a rotten place TV is. Barry Watson is slightly more talented than he's given credit for, but I doubt that'll save 'What about Brian' for me; and I doubt there's any chance I'll enjoy 'Studio 60' ... but I'll watch 'em both and get it over with. Who knows? I might be surprised.

TUESDAY at 8

'NCIS' opposite 'Gilmore Girls' opposite 'House' opposite 'Friday Night Lights' ... the first three can be skipped for the fourth, but what happens if I LIKE 'Friday Night Lights' (some weird intuition is telling me I might)? 'NCIS' is really enjoyable but comparatively lightweight; 'House' ditto ... and, now that I think about it, ditto 'Gilmore Girls' despite its hugely intelligent writing. Still, 'House' will probably end up winning in the long run, especially if 'Friday Night Lights' gets cancelled.

TUESDAY at 9

'Knights of Prosperity' and 'Help Me Help You' opposite 'The Unit' opposite 'Veronica Mars' opposite 'Standoff' opposite 'Law & Order Criminal Intent' ... the sitcoms can be ignored (even Steve's 'watch everything' rule doesn't apply to Ted Danson vehicles), and the premiere of 'Standoff' was boring (despite the presence of the mighty Gina Torres, who really deserves to STAR in a show, instead of yelling at McBain to follow the book), and 'Criminal Intent' is a butcher's shop full of hammery ... which leaves 'The Unit' up against 'Veronica Mars' - which, as all discerning TV viewers know, is no contest at all.

TUESDAY at 10

'Boston Legal' opposite 'Smith' opposite 'Law & Order SVU' ... 'Smith is the only new show here and seems intensely predictable in a 'Sopranos' meets 'Desperate Housewives' way (although it stars Amy Smart AND Jonny Lee Miller, two actors I also think are underrated). 'SVU' is just too damn depressing, although well done - I really don't see either of these shows competing with the gut-bustingly hilarious performances turned in week after week by William Shatner as Denny Crane on 'Boston Legal' (oh! How I wish Leonard Nimoy could be tempted to return to TV in an equally signature role ... not broad farce comedy, but something more cerebral, more brooding ... but what? I'll mull ... )

WEDNESDAY at 8

'Jericho' opposite 'Bones' opposite 'Twenty Good Years' and '30 Rock' ... the sitcoms are both knew but look ex-tremely perishable, and despite its razor-sharp dialogue 'Bones' hasn't managed to hook me (maybe because EVERY FIBRE OF MY BEING rebels against the HERETICAL AFFRONT of calling ANY other TV character by that nickname, other than Leonard H. McCoy), but 'Jericho' intrigues me slightly, despite the fact that it stars that fish-mouthed block of wood, Skeet Ulrich. We shall see...

WEDNESDAY at 9

'Lost' opposite 'Criminal Minds' opposite 'One Tree Hill' opposite 'Justice' ... which leaves 'Justice' the clear winner! The first three barely rise to the level of 'meh' in my book, but I've very much liked what I've seen of 'Justice' so far, especially, of course, Victor Garber in the center role.

WEDNESDAY at 10

'The Nine' opposite 'CSI NY' opposite 'Kidnapped' ... hmmmm... 'CSI NY' has never done anything for me, so it can be safely skipped. 'Kidnapped' is of course getting all the big buzz, but strikes me as a tad boring for the long haul. Whereas 'The Nine' has Kim Raver, the mighty Chi McBride AND one of my favorite TV character actors John Billingsley. I don't like the show's gimmicky premise, but I might learn to live with it.

THURSDAY at 8

'Ugly Betty' opposite 'Smallville' opposite 'Til Death' and 'Happy Hour' opposite 'My Name is Earl' and 'The Office' ... the sitcoms here seem egregiously rotten, eminently skippable, except for 'The Office' - but that could be WORSE than rotten ... it could be CORRUPTED, if the network follows through on the tone of its commercials and turns the show into the Jim and Pam Romantic Dramedy Show. That would be more painful by far than watching a bad show. 'Ugly Betty' seems boring, and really, how could anything compare with 'Smallville' as the show continues to ratchet up and up? Elsewhere in this issue of TV Guide, there's a picture of the teenaged Green Arrow who'll appear on the show October 5th ... even without General Zod and the Phantom Zone, that would be reason enough to tune in!

THURSDAY at 9

'Grey's Anatomy' opposite 'CSI' opposite 'Supernatural' opposite 'The O.C.' ... well, 'Grey's Anatomy' is out because I'm not, in fact, a woman. And 'The O.C.' is one of those shows (like 'Melrose Place') you're always surprised to learn is still on the air - it's like once it flashed in the pan, the pan should have been cleaned and put away until the next flash shows up. That leaves the mighty 'CSI' (which can do no wrong) up against 'Supernatural' which ended with the mother of all cliffhangers. So I certainly know which premiere I'll be watching (although I'll be COMPLAINING through the whole of it, since the cliffhanger in question was one in which our trio of main characters COULD NOT SURVIVE ... the only thing possible for the writers to do is either a) alter some detail of the cliffhanger or b) have the bad guys act entirely out of character ... I'm as big a fan of cliffhangers as walks the Earth, but I HATE it when they cheat like that)

THURSDAY at 10

'Six Degrees' opposite 'Shark' opposite 'ER' ... I'm thinking about reading for this hour folks, or perhaps popping in 'High School Musical' for a quick pick-me-up...

FRIDAY

The only thing I'll be watching is 'Law & Order' at 10 ... and I won't even be watching THAT, since I will automatically, unalterably, eternally look for the show at 10 on Wednesdays ... perhaps one of you can explain to me what could possibly possess the network to move this show ...

SATURDAY

Why, there's absolutely nothing on Saturday night! Guess I'll go out drinking! Or, er, stay in drinking ... ulp ...

SUNDAY

Aside from the mighty 'Simpsons,' there's a new show called 'Brothers & Sisters' that stars, on the plus side, the always-wonderful Ron Rifkin and on the negative side, the weirdly off-putting Calista Flockhart ... hmmmm...

And there we have it! All things considered, a fairly orderly fall TV season! No major pile-ups at any one hour of any one day, and by happy chance most of the new shows that intrigue me seem unconflicted, at least for a few viewings. Of course, there'll be 'Dexter' on Showtime, and there'll be the aforementioned 'Battlestar Galactica' ... and I may very well LIKE more new shows than I anticipate ... but for now, I foresee lots of good clean fun!

The Cantabridgians among you can stop scrolling down now ... yes, it's true: the WHOLE THING was about TV.